This blog task is given by Prakruti Bhatt Ma'am. Let discuss it :

Plagiarism and Academic Integrity: Ethical Reflections Under MLA Guidelines

Academic integrity is a fundamental principle of scholarly work. It ensures that students honestly represent their own ideas while properly acknowledging the intellectual contributions of others. Plagiarism is not limited to copying words directly; it also includes using ideas, structure, or previously submitted work without proper citation. The following ethical dilemmas help clarify how MLA guidelines address paraphrasing, collaboration, and self-plagiarism.

1. Paraphrasing Without Citation: Ethical and MLA Perspective

Under MLA guidelines, paraphrasing always requires citation. Paraphrasing means expressing someone else’s ideas in one’s own words and sentence structure. However, even when the wording is changed, the original idea still belongs to the original author. MLA clearly states that both direct quotations and paraphrased ideas must be cited because the intellectual content is not the student’s original creation.

In the given situation, the student rewrites the scholarly paragraph by changing vocabulary and sentence structure but keeps the same ideas and logical sequence. This would still be considered plagiarism under MLA guidelines because the student has used another author’s intellectual work without giving proper credit. Plagiarism is not only about copying exact words; it also involves presenting someone else’s ideas, arguments, or analysis as one’s own.

Proper paraphrasing requires two important steps: first, rewriting the idea completely in one’s own language and understanding, and second, providing an in-text citation along with a Works Cited reference. Citation acknowledges the original author’s contribution and maintains transparency in academic writing.

If I were in this situation, I would always cite the original source. Providing citation demonstrates honesty and respect for intellectual property. It also strengthens the credibility of my academic work, because it shows that my arguments are supported by reliable scholarly sources. Ethical academic writing is not only about avoiding plagiarism but also about participating responsibly in scholarly conversation.

2. Shared Structure and Argument: Collaboration or Plagiarism?

Collaboration, such as studying together, exchanging notes, and discussing ideas, is generally encouraged in academic settings because it promotes learning and critical thinking. However, there is an important distinction between collaboration and plagiarism.

If two students submit essays that are not identical in wording but share the same structure, examples, and argument sequence, the situation becomes ethically questionable. While discussion and idea sharing are acceptable, each student’s final work must reflect their independent thinking and individual interpretation.

When the structure and argument path are extremely similar, it may be considered unauthorized collaboration or plagiarism, depending on institutional policies. This is because the originality of academic work lies not only in wording but also in the organization of ideas, argument development, and analytical approach.

Ethically, students should use collaboration as a tool for understanding concepts but should write their assignments independently. Each student should develop their own argument, structure, and examples. If collaboration is permitted, students should follow the instructor’s guidelines and acknowledge any significant assistance.

In this situation, I would ensure that while discussing ideas with classmates, I develop my own unique interpretation and structure when writing my essay. This maintains academic integrity and ensures that my work genuinely reflects my individual understanding and intellectual effort.

3. Reusing One’s Own Previous Work Without Citation: Self-Plagiarism

MLA guidelines recognize the reuse of one’s own previously submitted academic work without citation as a form of plagiarism known as self-plagiarism. Although the work originally belongs to the student, submitting the same material again without acknowledgment creates a false impression that it is entirely new work.

Academic assignments are designed to evaluate a student’s current learning, effort, and original thinking. Reusing previous work without citation undermines this purpose and violates academic honesty.

An ethical approach would involve informing the instructor and properly acknowledging the previous work. The student could cite their earlier assignment or clearly mention that certain ideas or sections were adapted from their previous work. In many cases, instructors expect students to produce entirely new content unless permission is given.

If I were in this situation, I would inform the instructor and either rewrite the content with new analysis or properly acknowledge the earlier work. This ensures transparency and maintains trust between the student and the academic institution.

Conclusion: The Importance of Academic Integrity

These ethical dilemmas demonstrate that plagiarism includes more than copying words directly. It also involves using another person’s ideas without citation, excessively relying on shared argument structures, or reusing one’s own previous work without acknowledgment. MLA guidelines emphasize that proper citation is essential whenever ideas, words, or arguments are taken from any source.

Academic integrity requires honesty, responsibility, and respect for intellectual property. By properly citing sources, developing independent arguments, and producing original work, students contribute ethically to academic scholarship. Maintaining academic integrity not only protects students from plagiarism but also strengthens their credibility, learning, and intellectual growth.

Thank You...